Stoke Newington CAAC August 2016

Planning Applications for Stoke Newington CAAC Monday 8 August 2016

125, Stoke Newington Church St, N16 (Restaurant use + single-storey rear extension etc) – 2016/2032 (Louise Smith)

We have no objection to the proposals.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

37, Kersley Road, N16 (Part single, part 2-storey rear extension) – 2016/2567 (Louise Smith)

We have no objections to the proposals.

58, Lordship Park, N16 (Single-storey rear infill extension) – 2016/2147 (Nick Bovaird)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Flat C 27, Digby Crescent, N4 (Rear roof extension + terrace above rear outrigger) – 2016/1171 (Nick Bovaird)

We no longer make comments on applications affecting this part of the CA.

2, Defoe Road, N16 (Variation 2, 4 etc.) – 2016/1681 (Tim Wild)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Wilmer Place, N16 (Internal remodelling) – 2016/1290 (Nick Bovaird)

We have no objections to the proposals, but make the following observation:-

• The employment potential of the whole site should be retained.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

49-51, Leswin Road, N16 (1st floor rear extension and additional mansard storey at 2nd floor level) - 2016/2711 (Tim Wild)

We object to the proposals for the following reason:-

• The mansard slopes should be set back from the front and rear parapets.
• The mansard slopes should be no steeper than 70deg.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

Flat 2 36, Gloucester Drive, N4 (Garden shed) – 2016/2087 (Sinead Normoyle)

We no longer make comments on applications affecting this part of the CA.

6, Albion Road, N16 (Single-storey rear infill extension) – 2016/2665 (Simon Robert)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

42, Queen Elizabeths Walk, N16 (Single-storey rear extensions etc.) – 2016/2773 (Louise Smith)

We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

• We agree with the applicant that the proposed extensions are larger than would normally be approved and we consider the proposals to be overdevelopment of the site.

147, Stoke Newington High Street, N16 (New shopfront) – 2016/2709 (Nick Bovaird)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Palm Court, Queen Elizabeths Walk, N16 (Single-storey rear extensions) – 2016/2081 (Tim Wild)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

2F, Queen Elizabeths Walk, N16 (Single-storey side extension and rear extension) – 2016/2005 (Simon Robert)

We object to the proposals for the following reason:-

• The front elevation of the side extension should be set back further from the main front elevation.