Stoke Newington CAAC October 2016

Planning Applications for Stoke Newington CAAC Monday 10 October 2016

Flat A, 94 Hawksley Road, N16 (Single-storey rear infill extension) – 2016/3043 (James Carleton)

We have no objection to the proposals.

60-62, Stoke Newington Church St, N16 (New shopfront and internally-illuminated fascia sign) – 2016/2225 & 2244 (Louise Smith)

We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

• The loss of the divisions in the fascia shown in the previously approved proposals.
• The inappropriate scale of the lettering.
• The lettering should not be internally illuminated

Flat B, 36 Gloucester Drive, N4 (2-storey rear extension) – 2016/3202 (James Carleton)

We no longer make comments on applications affecting this part of the CA.

Land at Wilmer Place, N16 (2, 3 & 4-storey building in previous car park) – 2016/3179 (Nick Bovaird)

We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

• The detailing of the elevation facing the Cemetery is over articulated and gives the feeling of being too “busy”.
• We are happy with the two-thirds commercial use, but there should be more space between the development and the Cemetery.

42-46, Queen Elizabeths Walk, N16 (Rear dormer roof extensions etc.) – 2016/3269 (Louise Smith)
We object to the proposals for the following reasons:-

• The proposals would lead to overdevelopment of the site.=
• The proposed combined rear dormer would be an overlarge element in the domestic scale of the area.

The Three Crowns 175 Stoke Newington Church Street, N16 (Temporary scaffolding shroud) – 2016/3435 (Catherine Slade)

We object to the proposal for the following reasons:-

• Advertisements are not appropriate in the Conservation Area.

Please note that we were not consulted on this application

285, Stoke Newington Church Street, N16 (Rear dormer roof extension) - 2016/3670 (Tim Wild)

We have no objections to the proposals.

17, Grazebrook Road, N16 (Single-storey rear/side extension etc.) – 2016/3567 (Tim Wild)

We have no objections to the proposals.

Please note that this application was incorrectly listed as not being in the Conservation Area.